<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relevant Anchor Tags and Link Building</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/</link>
	<description>Where Geeks can be Geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:40:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/comment-page-1/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrywheeler.ca/?p=896#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>From what I have learned from some testing that I’ve done, a link regardless of where it comes from (besides sites deemed to be bad link partners because of practices deemed unacceptable by Google such as link farms etc) does provide an added boost to SERPs.  However, links coming from sites with relevant content related to the site being linked to provides a bigger boost to SERPs.

This is one small portion of what must be considered when obtaining the link.  You must also consider the probability of someone clicking on that link to drive traffic to a site and then once they have clicked, the likelihood this traffic will convert.  Having an article as you say about improving your golf swing and expect someone to click on a link provided in the resource for something so far removed such as “natural cancer cures” is a little unrealistic.  Sure you may get some clicks on the link, but will it really be traffic that will convert once you’ve got them on your site?

Arguments can also be made about the site “ezinearticles” itself.  It is a general article directory that covers a wide range of topics.  It may provide a link but overall it may be like a general directory and provide little boost to SERPs or be valued less in the search engines as to the quality of link provided.

The other factor as you have referenced is with respect to the anchor text.  This is one of the factors used in determining how well a site will rank with respect to the keywords or linking text you use when building your links.

Google’s and Bing’s algorithms for determining relevancy have improved so much they can determine if the content at the destination of link is related to the link text used.  For example, if you link to a site with the link text “Free IPOD” and then talk about FOREX at the site linked to, the rankings will be impacted because of the lack of relevancy in the link text and the topic on the destination.  Additionally, it will be considerably less likely that the traffic received because of clicks will be very pleased to discover they’ve been duped thus impacting conversion rates again.

Varying your keywords relevant to your site and your site content ensures that you rank well for the niche occupied.  It is essential that you use relevant keywords or you end up ranking for unrelated terms which impacts traffic and conversion.

Publishing great content on sites such as ezinearticles however, will generate you traffic.  It will provide links and will get your sites exposure.

The key comes from developing well written and unique content that will attract both natural links and readership to your sites.

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I have learned from some testing that I’ve done, a link regardless of where it comes from (besides sites deemed to be bad link partners because of practices deemed unacceptable by Google such as link farms etc) does provide an added boost to SERPs.  However, links coming from sites with relevant content related to the site being linked to provides a bigger boost to SERPs.</p>
<p>This is one small portion of what must be considered when obtaining the link.  You must also consider the probability of someone clicking on that link to drive traffic to a site and then once they have clicked, the likelihood this traffic will convert.  Having an article as you say about improving your golf swing and expect someone to click on a link provided in the resource for something so far removed such as “natural cancer cures” is a little unrealistic.  Sure you may get some clicks on the link, but will it really be traffic that will convert once you’ve got them on your site?</p>
<p>Arguments can also be made about the site “ezinearticles” itself.  It is a general article directory that covers a wide range of topics.  It may provide a link but overall it may be like a general directory and provide little boost to SERPs or be valued less in the search engines as to the quality of link provided.</p>
<p>The other factor as you have referenced is with respect to the anchor text.  This is one of the factors used in determining how well a site will rank with respect to the keywords or linking text you use when building your links.</p>
<p>Google’s and Bing’s algorithms for determining relevancy have improved so much they can determine if the content at the destination of link is related to the link text used.  For example, if you link to a site with the link text “Free IPOD” and then talk about FOREX at the site linked to, the rankings will be impacted because of the lack of relevancy in the link text and the topic on the destination.  Additionally, it will be considerably less likely that the traffic received because of clicks will be very pleased to discover they’ve been duped thus impacting conversion rates again.</p>
<p>Varying your keywords relevant to your site and your site content ensures that you rank well for the niche occupied.  It is essential that you use relevant keywords or you end up ranking for unrelated terms which impacts traffic and conversion.</p>
<p>Publishing great content on sites such as ezinearticles however, will generate you traffic.  It will provide links and will get your sites exposure.</p>
<p>The key comes from developing well written and unique content that will attract both natural links and readership to your sites.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackout blinds</title>
		<link>http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>blackout blinds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 06:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrywheeler.ca/?p=896#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>Barry, could you elaborate on your response to Lee a bit?  He is asking whether he can publish completely unrelated articles on ezinearticles (i.e., about how to improve your golf swing) and then in the author resource box include anchor text to niche websites that have nothing to do with golf.  I have the same problem.  I want quality backlinks from ezinearticles but do not necessarily always want to write about the subjects of my websites.  Granted, I lose big in terms of getting any direct traffic from my articles because readers for the article will likely have no interest in clicking through the anchor text.  But a link is a link is a link as you say.  So in terms of a pure backlinking building strategy, it shouldn&#039;t matter if the anchor text is relevant to my article, should it?  And in terms of getting my article republished by other webmasters and increasing the viral links, it might be better to write about general interest topics rather than a narrow niche.  Thoughts?  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry, could you elaborate on your response to Lee a bit?  He is asking whether he can publish completely unrelated articles on ezinearticles (i.e., about how to improve your golf swing) and then in the author resource box include anchor text to niche websites that have nothing to do with golf.  I have the same problem.  I want quality backlinks from ezinearticles but do not necessarily always want to write about the subjects of my websites.  Granted, I lose big in terms of getting any direct traffic from my articles because readers for the article will likely have no interest in clicking through the anchor text.  But a link is a link is a link as you say.  So in terms of a pure backlinking building strategy, it shouldn&#8217;t matter if the anchor text is relevant to my article, should it?  And in terms of getting my article republished by other webmasters and increasing the viral links, it might be better to write about general interest topics rather than a narrow niche.  Thoughts?  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwheeler</title>
		<link>http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>bwheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrywheeler.ca/?p=896#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>Lee,

To answer your question, there is no one simple answer.  The article you are publishing if it contains relevant content to your site, and the link itself contains relevant anchor tags, it will help in the boosting of your rankings in the long run.

The problem that you will have with ezinearticles is that it will probably have more authority for your site, thus indexed more frequently.  It is possible for the article to rank better than your actual website for the content.

Another pitfall is that you will have to promote your article in the directory as well, to get it indexed.  With ezinearticles, the article typically gets buried in the back pages pretty quickly.  Thus if there are no links to it, Google and the other search engines can&#039;t fine it.

The basic rule is - &quot;A link is a link is a link&quot;, the more relevant links you have the better - that&#039;s a given.  However, article marketing is a proven and accepted method of gaining quality one-way links.

Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee,</p>
<p>To answer your question, there is no one simple answer.  The article you are publishing if it contains relevant content to your site, and the link itself contains relevant anchor tags, it will help in the boosting of your rankings in the long run.</p>
<p>The problem that you will have with ezinearticles is that it will probably have more authority for your site, thus indexed more frequently.  It is possible for the article to rank better than your actual website for the content.</p>
<p>Another pitfall is that you will have to promote your article in the directory as well, to get it indexed.  With ezinearticles, the article typically gets buried in the back pages pretty quickly.  Thus if there are no links to it, Google and the other search engines can&#8217;t fine it.</p>
<p>The basic rule is &#8211; &#8220;A link is a link is a link&#8221;, the more relevant links you have the better &#8211; that&#8217;s a given.  However, article marketing is a proven and accepted method of gaining quality one-way links.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrywheeler.ca/?p=896#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>I have a related question to this informative post:
If I publish an article in an article directory and they allow me to include a link(s) to a website in the author resource box at the end of the article.  The article directory is a general directory (ezine articles) and covers hundreds of topics so there is no particular relevancy in general within the article directory site itself.

The article I am writing has no particular relevance to my website that I am trying to improve the rank of in order to be at the top of the SERPS.   The anchor text I am putting into the author resource box is a relevant keyword to my website although there is no particular relevance to the article itself.   Do you think that this will still help to get me to rank for my keyword and improve the SERP?  I cannot always write relevant articles to the website I am anchoring to. 
 Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a related question to this informative post:<br />
If I publish an article in an article directory and they allow me to include a link(s) to a website in the author resource box at the end of the article.  The article directory is a general directory (ezine articles) and covers hundreds of topics so there is no particular relevancy in general within the article directory site itself.</p>
<p>The article I am writing has no particular relevance to my website that I am trying to improve the rank of in order to be at the top of the SERPS.   The anchor text I am putting into the author resource box is a relevant keyword to my website although there is no particular relevance to the article itself.   Do you think that this will still help to get me to rank for my keyword and improve the SERP?  I cannot always write relevant articles to the website I am anchoring to.<br />
 Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/comment-page-1/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrywheeler.ca/?p=896#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>Hello Barry, 

Can you tell me a little about:  Best Practices when assigning keywords to a page on a website.   As I understand it, the keywords should live on the particular page.  If the keywords live in the headings and title it&#039;s even the even better.  

Is it disadvantageous to create a key word like fundraising, and list it in as many multiples/plurals/or tenses.  

For example:  fundraise, fund raise, fundraisers, fund raisers fundraising, fund raising. 

If this is a topic already covered in an article on your blog, can you please point me to this great information. 

Thanks for your help.

Elizabeth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Barry, </p>
<p>Can you tell me a little about:  Best Practices when assigning keywords to a page on a website.   As I understand it, the keywords should live on the particular page.  If the keywords live in the headings and title it&#8217;s even the even better.  </p>
<p>Is it disadvantageous to create a key word like fundraising, and list it in as many multiples/plurals/or tenses.  </p>
<p>For example:  fundraise, fund raise, fundraisers, fund raisers fundraising, fund raising. </p>
<p>If this is a topic already covered in an article on your blog, can you please point me to this great information. </p>
<p>Thanks for your help.</p>
<p>Elizabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/comment-page-1/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator>rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 04:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrywheeler.ca/?p=896#comment-1111</guid>
		<description>thanx for this infomation....there is a lot to learn things...nice post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanx for this infomation&#8230;.there is a lot to learn things&#8230;nice post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://www.barrywheeler.ca/2009/09/relevant-anchor-tags-and-link-building/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barrywheeler.ca/?p=896#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>Hi Barry!  Great refresher~!  I figured this was the essence of this science.  Thank you for the very comprehensive well described clarification.  Great Blog!  Thank you for your help - every time!
Elizabeth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barry!  Great refresher~!  I figured this was the essence of this science.  Thank you for the very comprehensive well described clarification.  Great Blog!  Thank you for your help &#8211; every time!<br />
Elizabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
